QSR1910/4/3/6

Criminal Appeal Act 1907; R v Henry Hogan (alias Edward Cross)

21st October 1910

From: 1907 To: 1910

2; Charge; That on 2nd September 1907 Henry Hogan did unlawfully, knowingly and designedly falsely pretend to Mary Elizabeth Moore that a certain paper writing was a good and valid order for the payment of money and that the signature was a genuine signature by means of which false pretence he did obtain from the said Mary Elizabeth Moore the sum of £6:8 shillings with intent to defraud. 3; When, where and by whom tried? 12th nOctober 1910 at the Quarter Sessions held at the Shire Hall Bedford before Samuel Howard Whitbread Esq. Deputy Chairman and the Justices 4: Plea; Guilty 6: Sentence; Imprisonment for one day 7: Previous convictions; 17th Sept 1888 Central Criminal Court (Fruad) 18 months with HL 17th May 1899 Chelmsford Sessions (Fruad) 11 months with HL 26th April 1901 Glasgow Circuit (uttering forged bill) 18 months with HL 28th April 1908 Central Criminal Court (forgery) 3 years penal servitude 8; Whether Certificate under section 3 given? No 9: Whether Applicant was defended by Counsel; undefended 10; Whether applicant bailed before trial; No 11: Prosecutor; David Teale, Chief Constable, Borough of Luton 12; Prosecutors Counsel; Mr C E Dyer, 2 Harcourt Buildings, Temple 13; Prosecutors Solicitor; Bruce Penny, Luton 14: Shorthand writer; John Hamson, Beds. Times Office Bedford signed -Clerk of the Peace - no signature Dated 21st October 1910

8

item

Hogan, Henry,
Cross, Edward,
Moore, Mary Elizabeth,
Whitbread, Samuel Howard,
Teale, David,
Dyer, C.E.,
Penny, Bruce,
Hamson, John

BEDFORD, Chelmsford, Glasgow, LUTON, London, appeal, fraud