X95/292/178

From: Thomas Sworder, Luton: To: Thomas Sworder, Hertford;

5 Dec 1866

From: 1866 To: 1866

From: Thomas Sworder, Luton; To: Thomas Sworder, Hertford “I only got Mr.Cowell’s letter on my return from Caddington on Saturday afternoon. I think you will be in time with Mr.Primrose as I doubt Mr.Cowell had been asked by Mr.Primrose to find him a Brewer. I have heard since I wrote from another source that Mr.Primrose is a highly respectable man but he has got wrong with his beer. Anstee & Co. have no objection to the King’s Arms being given up on the tenant being fairly compensated. You ought to stipulate that the King’s Arms be disused as a public house, say from Michas next, otherwise it won’t benefit your other houses. If that is done away with there will still be 8 public houses immediately round the clump of buildings proposed to be pulled down.” From: Thomas Sworder, Luton; 5 Dec 1866 To: Thomas Sworder, Hertford “I only got Mr.Cowell’s letter on my return from Caddington on Saturday afternoon. I think you will be in time with Mr.Primrose as I doubt Mr.Cowell had been asked by Mr.Primrose to find him a Brewer. I have heard since I wrote from another source that Mr.Primrose is a highly respectable man but he has got wrong with his beer. Anstee & Co. have no objection to the King’s Arms being given up on the tenant being fairly compensated. You ought to stipulate that the King’s Arms be disused as a public house, say from Michas next, otherwise it won’t benefit your other houses. If that is done away with there will still be 8 public houses immediately round the clump of buildings proposed to be pulled down.”

item

Sworder, Thomas,
Cowell, George,
Sworder, Edward Robert,
Primrose, Philip T.,
Anstee, William,
Cook, John,
Bennett, Benjamin

business correspondence, family correspondence, Trunch, brewing, CADDINGTON, Trunch Brewery, beer, Luton Kings Arms, Market Hill